The Abrahamic Base of Christianity

-

Two Covenants, One Promise

A logical reconstruction of the seven-point teaching
[Outline]

I. The Root: Promise, Not Ethnicity

Central Claim

Christianity did not grow out of Judaism as its institutional predecessor. This popular assumption ("Woozle effect") is contra­dicted by apostolic teaching.

Key Argument

  • The promises were given to Abraham and to his seed (Gal 3:16) — referring to Christ, not to a nation.
  • The heir did not come by human effort (Ishmael / flesh) but by divine promise: Isaac.
  • "We are children of promise, not children of flesh." (Gal 4:28)
  • The Abrahamic line leads to the Messiah — not merely to Israel's national identity.

Transition

The human, family line is mainly Israelite, yes — but the covenant source and "logic" is Messianic, far before / far beyond the Mosaic period and that is what matters for what follows.

II. The Two Covenants: Their Order and Purpose

Central Claim

Apostolic theology is structured around two essentially different covenants, not one continuous religious development.

Key Arguments

  • The Mosaic Covenant — "covenant of law, sin, and death" (Rom 8:2):
    • Personal and national, exclusive to Israel.
    • Arrived 430 years after the Messianic covenant (Gal 3:17).
    • Deals with sin and external holiness within one nation.
  • The Messianic / Abrahamic Covenant — Covenant or "Law of the Spirit of life" (Rom 8:2) :
    • Earlier, broader, timeless, and global.
    • Designed for inclusive sanctification of every nation.
    • "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations." (Mt 28:19-20)
    • Not kept for one people — meant to be shared among nations.

• suggestion
Considerable: The sequence matters — the Abrahamic covenant precedes and supersedes the Mosaic. The later covenant cannot override or redefine the original promise. This is Paul's entire argument in Galatians 3: law cannot annul a previously ratified covenant.This is the argument in Heb 7: law and it's institutions are temporary, sacrifices must be repeated, priesthood is human, not eternal - in comparison with the original, Priestly rank of the Messiah King.

III. Love and Purpose: The Dynamic Difference

Central Claim

The two covenants are not just chronologically different — they operate on entirely different dynamics and aims.

The Mosaic System

  • Demands rules, sacrifices, and a specially trained (and temporary) priesthood.
  • The priesthood itself needed ritual cleansing. (Heb 7)
  • Atonement was annual, external, and mechanical — the sacrifice was examined, not the sinner's soul.
  • No transformation of character. No personal life with God through the Spirit.
  • Status quo renewed every year. No progress, no change.

The New Covenant

  • The ceremonial system and written code nailed to the cross — wiped out. (Col 2:14)
  • The Law fulfilled in its real meaning: love.
  • The 10 Commandments are holy — but were never intended to function as the path to salvation or inheritance.
  • "If the inheritance is from the law, it is no longer from the promise; but God granted it to Abraham through the promise." (Gal 3:18)

• suggestion
Considerable: The distinction is not law vs. lawlessness — it is external code vs. internal transformation. The Spirit writes the law on the heart (Jer 31:33), which is what the Mosaic system could not accomplish by design. When Pentecost fulfilled the Jeremiah's prophecy The Messiah sent the Spirit to finish this period with the Law and to help the believers in the New adopted, beloved status, through the personal, counseling work. (Jn 14:26)

IV. Redemption: What Jesus Actually Came to Do

Central Claim

Jesus came to redeem those under the Law — not to confirm or perpetuate the Mosaic system.

Key Arguments

  • "God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the Law, to redeem those who were under the Law." (Gal 4:4-5)
  • Jesus cannot be a Jewish priest according to the Mosaic law — he comes from Judah, not from Aaron or Levi. He has no part in the Mosaic priestly rank or ceremony. (Heb 7)
  • Therefore Jesus operates as a priest of a different order — the order of Melchizedek (Ps 110:4; Heb 5:5-6, 9-10).
  • Melchizedek represents God Most High — pre-Mosaic, universal, not tribal.
  • This new / greater priesthood serves perfection, not the Levitical system. (Heb 7:11-12)

• suggestion
Considerable: The Melchizedek priesthood is the theological bridge between the Abrahamic covenant and the New Covenant. By being a priest "according to the order of Melchizedek," Jesus bypasses and transcends the entire Levitical structure — confirming that the New Covenant belongs to a different, earlier, and higher order entirely. We have to be aware of the modern role of Christian priesthood. Melchizedek's order is not a symbolic picture: this is the actual status of the Christians. We are the priestly order under the authority of Christ Who is the High Priest according to the order of Melchizedek.

V. The Greater Covenant: Access for All Nations

Central Claim

The New Covenant, now in force, is not a monoculture. It belongs to all nations — and "Judaizing" trends distort this reality.

Key Arguments

  • "The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" (Rom 8:2) — this is the operating covenant now.
  • All nations have equal access. Christianity is not a national or local culture.
  • The Judaizing problem: focusing on Jewish cultural heritage and Mosaic spiritual principles pulls the Christian mind away from the total victory of the Cross.
  • The heir who is a child behaves no differently from a slave — even if he owns everything. (Gal 4:1-3)
  • "When the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son... so that we might receive adoption as sons." (Gal 4:4-5)
  • The result: no longer a slave, but a son — and if a son, then an heir through God. (Gal 4:7)

Two Lines Illustrated: Hagar and Sarah (Gal 4:22-26)

  • Hagar = Sinai = present Jerusalem = slavery
  • Sarah = the promise = Jerusalem above = freedom
  • "But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother." (Gal 4:26)

• suggestion
Considerable: Maturity here is not about theological sophistication alone — it is about owning one's inheritance. The immature heir lives like a slave not because he lacks status, but because he doesn't yet know — or trust — that the inheritance is already his in Christ. The immature cannot practise what the mature can.

VI. Law vs. Love — The Practical Consequences

Central Claim

Living according to the old covenant is not merely an intellectual error — it has spiritual sources and concrete spiritual + relational consequences.

Two Serious Consequences of "Keeping the Law" without fulfilling

1. Breaking the Real Law VS. Living in Truth

  • Partial law-keeping is not law-keeping — it is law-breaking. "If you want to keep a part of the Law, you are obligated to keep the whole." (Gal 5:3)
  • The Law is holy and cannot be used selectively. God -fearing person cannot use the Law as a menu.
  • God is One (Echad). The holiness of the Law reflects that wholeness — it cannot be divided.
  • The Law's function: to reveal the Perfect, and thereby reveal our brokenness. It was never designed for salvation.
  • Salvation was designed for salvation: restoring the relationship with God, Having a right to receive the Holy spirit, living in the heritage (permeated by love), learning the mature freedom lead by the Lord, and co-working in God's family as adopted heir. (Rom 8:12-17)

2. Stunted, Judgmental Life vs. Mature Christian Life with Eternal Justification

  • No action of the flesh can substitute the free gift of restoration and the heir's status in the family.
  • The drift toward law is driven by mistrust — the person never owns the heritage based on Christ's merit alone.
  • This person continually tries to "do something for the kingdom" by flesh — the pattern seen in the Galatians.
  • Result: spiritual infantilism, brokenness, judgmentalism and being sealed from Christ!
  • "You who are trying to be justified by the law are alienated from Christ; you have fallen from grace." (Gal 5:4)
  • "What matters is faith working through love." (Gal 5:6)

The Root Problem: Mistrust and the "Leaven of the Pharisees"

  • The mixed culture (old + new) is the "leaven of the Pharisees" — an enmity within the Christian life.
  • Drift toward law = departure from grace and from Christ.
  • The Holy Spirit alone — the Spirit's law of life in Christ (Rom 8:2) — breaks this domain of the judgmental spirit.
  • When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide into all truth. (Jn 16:13)

VII. Conclusions — The Nature of the Conflict

Summary of the Stakes

  • The return to Judaism — the Judaizing drift — is not merely a theological misunderstanding. The Apostle Paul calls it a sin of sorcery. (Gal 3:1-3)
  • The prophet Samuel equates disobedience with sorcery. (1 Sam 15:23)
  • This is not a conflict of mere intellect or tradition — it is a spiritual conflict. We must be very concerned when the trend appears.

The Christian Path

  • All power to break free from this domain is given in Christ.
  • We are given Grace. We are given the fulfillment of the Law through Love. (1John 4:7-12; Gal 5:4-6)
  • This path brings real conflict — including within families and communities.
  • Reason: this Christian path is not in the religious comfort zone. The conflict is directly proportional to our effort not to please people, but to live our lives guided by God’s word. (1 Sam 15:23-24)

The Resolution

  • We have a Helper. (Jn 16:13)
  • The Spirit of truth guides into all truth — this is the answer to every Judaizing pull.
  • Grace is the ground. Sonship is the status. Love fulfilling the Law is the walk.

• suggestion
Considerable: The seven-point structure moves from origin (promise to Abraham) through distinction (two covenants), purpose (love vs. rule), christology (Melchizedek priesthood), access (all nations), consequences (law vs. Spirit), and resolution (conflict, grace, the Helper). Read together, the argument is a sustained call: do not drift back. You are sons, not slaves. Walk in the Spirit, not in the Law.

Popular posts from this blog

Our Lord Jesus Christ

-
Image
a sermon from Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones including the main messianic prophecies You will recall that last Friday evening, in finishing our consideration of the doctrine of the covenant, the Great Covenant of Grace, we ended by emphasizing the fact that the covenant in both its expressions or in both its dispensations always points to the person of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. And therefore, we have come to our consideration of this great biblical doctrine of or concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. Now, while this is obviously and clearly not the starting point of biblical doctrine, it is certainly the core and the centre of biblical doctrine [the differentia of Christianity] ... We start with the great doctrine of God and how God has revealed himself and men and his need and so on. But obviously, we come to this which, as I say, is the core and the centre of biblical doctrine. Because the truth concerning the Lord Jesus Christ is at one and the same time the centra...
Read more

The Hos 6:6

-
Image
series: Our Living Word 2/4 Unveiling a surprising blind spot ..which is really important to Jesus. Hosea’s prophecy is an important key for Christianity, and we can confidently say the same for all of humanity, because the Lord Jesus Christ teaches this verse twice: Once for the sake of his disciples. Once for the sake of the whole world. I desire steadfast love (mercy) and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings. Hos 6:6 As we saw in the first part of the "Living Word" series , our possibilities have fundamentally changed and they have become more extensive with the arrival of Jesus Christ. He knows that Hosea 6:6 holds a profound revelation, often overlooked yet crucial to us all. He spoke openly about the fact that Hosea 6:6 was not just for Israel at that time. Rather, He talks about His ultimate Peace Plan - giving us a fundamental prophecy about His messianic calling, identity and ministry. I'm going to...
Read more

Saint, Holy

-
Image
I often meet and talk with people from different religious backgrounds. I found astonishingly large number of situations where various misconceptions about holiness and "being saint" were proclaimed. These misconceptions take many different forms, but they are almost always linked to a type of “humility” that is detached from reality and superficial, as well as to a view that one has no value as a person. People simply cannot be free from the "Roman Catholic" misconception that holiness is a human characteristic or quality of the human moral. Let me clarify that last sentence right away. According to Catholic teaching, holiness is not merely a human quality or moral trait, but primarily an essential attribute of God in which human beings share. Human moral perfection can only be called “holiness” in a secondary and derivative sense. Human holiness is indeed, in a moral sense, a quality of a person, but only as the fruit of God’s grace: “moral perfec...
Read more